Thursday, April 27, 2006

So How Much Trouble is Rove Really In?

Lots, apparently.

Via Raw Story, Rove's stint in front of the grand jury on Wednesday was "grueling". If he thought that was tough, wait until he ends up in jail eating the gruel they serve.

The three and a half hour duration is considered highly unusual for a fifth appearance before a grand jury, Shuster reported. Also not boding well for Rove is the fact that the grand jury plans to meet tomorrow. Some are speculating that an indictment for Rove may be handed up tomorrow, though others have claimed such a fast turnaround time is unlikely.

A gal can dream...

From the MSNBC transcript of David Shuster's reportage of Rove's appearance: (it's in all caps - sorry)

IN THE LIBBY INDICTMENT, ROVE WAS REFERRED TO AS "OFFICIAL A." THAT'S A DESIGNATION PROSECUTORS ARE REQUIRED TO GIVE WHEN THEY ARE REVEALING PERJORATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT A PERSON NOT YET CHARGED.
[...]
THAT'S BECAUSE PROSECUTORS ALMOST ALWAYS END UP INDICTING SOMEBODY IDENTIFIED AS OFFICIAL A. AND IN LOOKING THROUGH THE RECORD OF PATRICK FITZGERALD, HIS OFFICE HAS EVENTUALLY INDICTED OFFICIAL A IN EVERY CASE.

"Developing"...as they say...

Absolute power may corrupt absolutely, but absolute stupidity is just plain stupid.

UPDATE: The New York Times has more.

Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the C.I.A. leak case, is expected to decide in the next two to three weeks whether to bring perjury charges against Karl Rove, the powerful adviser to President Bush, lawyers involved in the case said Thursday.

No comments:

Post a Comment