I made a simple (and admittedly easy) prediction last nite: cranky Obama supporters will continue to be cranky Obama supporters when he wins the nomination. And I was right, of course.
Anyone who's followed blogs like Daily
the past few months has seen a level of ugly vitriol and kool-aid drunkenness that they ironically used to blast in neocons, their supporters, freepers, and wingnuts. Mass hysteria is not party-specific.
And then there are the cable news show talking
egos who have been whining for Hillary to shut up and get out, as if they're covering their ears so they don't have to put up with
the stereotypical nagging wife while they and the mainstream, so-called progressive bloggers have been screaming "Sexism?? What sexism??" And some people wonder why Hillary supporters are angry.
When I watched MSNBC's Tuesday nite coverage of the candidates' speeches, I couldn't help but notice the absolutely ridiculous "Waah! Hillary's making us talk about her again!! Tell her to STOP it!" whining. And then, right on cue, they'd go on talking about her anyway as if they had no control whatsoever. And the same thing is going on throughout the blogosphere today. It all reminds me of a teevee commercial I saw during the 60s. A guy walks into his workplace and complains about his lunch, "Chicken sandwiches, chicken sandwiches. Every day it's chicken sandwiches." Then one of his co-workers says, "Why don't you ask your wife to make something else?" to which the guy responds, "I'm not married."
[insert "d'oh" here]
You would think last nite and today would have been a cause for major celebrations among Obama supporters (and let's not pretend that the MSNBC crew hasn't been in the tank for months on end so that they would have to pretend to be unbiased
at this point). But, no. That bad Hillary woman is still making them talk about her and they just can't seen to make her automagically disappear.
Call the wahmbulance.
Sore winners. That's what they are. And it's quite the pathetic display. It's as if they have no idea how to be happy - if even for a moment. (I'll give Chris Matthews props for admitting last night that he had "the giggles"
and that, for him, it felt like New Year's Eve. At least he didn't admit to his leg "tingling" again, which was just creepy.)
As for me, I don't support the status quo Democratic party anyway so it really didn't matter to me who won and it won't make much difference whether a Democrat or Republican wins the WH in November. Surely I jest, you insist. Well, no
. Especially after knowing full well that Obama's foreign policy is just a stone's throw away from McSurge's. Just read the transcript
of Obama's speech to AIPAC on Wednesday. If you still think I'm wrong, go ahead and point out where the differences lie. I'll wait.
Imperialist America. Rah rah rah.
Let's not forget that Obama's all for "remaking the world" in America's image. Save the rest of us from that, please.
Clinton wanted to "obliterate" Iran. Obama wants to "eliminate" the "grave" threat. Does that sound familiar
Maybe that's why some Obama supporters aren't celebrating today. Even antiwar.com's Justin Raimondo, who admitted earlier this year that he had a crush
on Obama, has suddenly changed his tune
. But why now? Surely he read last year's speech
that Obama gave to AIPAC? Or the recent yay, Zionism!
speech he gave in a Jewish synagogue in Florida
? And he must know that Obama is only opposed to "dumb" wars - not all wars. If someone like Raimondo, who has been writing about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and the military-industrial complex for years was fooled, is there hope for other Obama supporters? Or more, importantly, do they even care?
I don't think so. So, where are the party hats and noisemakers, you cranky Obama supporters?
As for all of the speculation about whether she'll be chosen as his VP
(which mean Hillary forced everybody to talk about by apparently casting some sort of witch's spell on all of you poor, helpless people) - get real. It's not going to happen. So quit the bedwetting and get on with the general election race - which promises to be about as exciting as watching paint dry.
Is November here yet? Let's get on with it already. The American Empire awaits.(h/t about Raimondo's buyer's remorse to marisacat)Related:
If Obama thought he was having problems wooing pro-Zionist Jewish voters before, surely Jimmy Carter's endorsement of him on Tuesday won't help matters. And Carter was quite blunt on Wednesday about what bad news it would be
if Obama chose Hillary as his VP, stating that it would bring out the negative vulnerabilities in both of them. I've thought all along that if Obama won, he would choose a VP running mate who would basically be invisibly compliant - someone who won't make waves or steal the spotlight. Milquetoast, here we come. Sebelius
fits that bill. She's like the anti-Hillary in many respects - although some female Hillary supporters have already said that she'd just be a female-faced spokesmodel for the ticket, so they'd cry foul.
I should add that I congratulate the Democratic party on its first African-American nominee but, on the other hand, what took you so bloody long?
Oh - that reminds me of something Tweety has been saying the past couple of days - that you wouldn't see an African-American
being nominated in Europe or some South American countries. Gee, Matthews - do you think maybe the "American" part of that is a clue??
Labels: Barack Obama, Daily Kos, Election '08, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, MSNBC